The Missing Employees

Are you missing employees? Where did they go? I just got off the phone with a restaurant owner who temporarily closed one of his locations so that he could redistribute the staff to the other three. I’ve also heard or seen in the last week:

  • A Starbucks closing at 4:00 PM for lack of staff.
  • A director in a large accounting firm reporting that two pay raises in 9 months (for remote employees) are being characterized by the 30-something accountants as “non-competitive.”
  • Apple employees publishing an internal letter saying the company’s plan to require 3 days a week attendance is “unacceptable.”
  • A wire service story noting that only 12% of office workers in Manhattan have returned to their offices.
  • The manager of a new restaurant scheduling 27 interviews, then sitting through 26 no-shows.
  • Wait times for services businesses that are are unworkable for customers. Our tree trimmer offered me a date 4 months out. The pool contractor’s backlog is seven months. Both claimed insufficient crews to handle the business.

missing employeesI talk to at least a dozen employers a week, and all are complaining about the lack of qualified applicants. Several have raised their starting wage rates multiple times, with no discernable change in the flow of applicants.

What the hell is going on? To start, I don’t believe that it’s all the fault of supplementary unemployment benefits. It is true that the states which discontinued the supplements have somewhat lower unemployment rates, and that $300 a week is enough to entice a $10/hour employee, but the missing employees are across the wage range.

Factors Driving the Shortage and Wageflation

One fact is that the economic rebound since 2009 has not previously had much impact on wages.  They were bound to catch up at some point. The Federal Minimum Wage of $7.25 an hour is now insufficient to pay for basic apartment rent anywhere in the USA. Supplementary benefits or not, no one wants to put in 40 hours a week and not be able to live on what they earn.

Another is the absorption of women into the workforce. For much of the ’80s and ’90s, women working for the first time represented a net addition to the number of available workers. This had a depressing effect on wages, as there were more bodies chasing limited jobs. The employment market has adjusted to this new normal.

Remote working has frayed the cultural relationship between employers and employees. Where workers often stayed in a job because they had friends there, or were comfortable with their responsibilities, now salary is rapidly becoming the only factor they consider.

The inflationary pressures of deficit spending are shrinking the buying power of static paychecks.

The lessening of COVID-19 is releasing a backlog of employees who “wanted to move anyway,” but were hanging on to what security they had through the pandemic.

Most importantly, over 50% of the Baby Boomers are now over 65 years old. Generation X is much smaller, so these retirements impact mid-level employees and managers the most. The available pool of experienced people is literally shrinking.

Missing Employees and Exit Planning

If you are one of the Baby Boomers who are now 21% of the population but still own 51% of the private companies in the U.S., missing employees will impact you in more ways than just on your daily workload.

  • Increased labor costs will have a direct impact on profitability, and therefore valuations.
  • The challenge of retaining employees long enough to develop true proficiency is growing. Higher turnover means you’ll need more people for the same tasks.
  • The long-term commitment of a relationship where someone is in training to assume control of the business becomes in many cases, unimaginable to an employee.
  • Lack of experience in a management team also detracts from enterprise value.
  • In businesses that depend on repeat customers, relationships may need to be reestablished regularly.

I saw a cartoon a few weeks ago. An owner is talking to his employees. He says “When we said you were essential workers, we didn’t mean you should be paid like essential workers.” Perhaps they can be forgiven for misunderstanding.

In our mission statements, we often say that employees are our most important asset. It looks like we may have to put our money where our mouth is.

 

 

Posted in Entrepreneurship, Exit Planning, Leadership, Management | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

4 Responses to The Missing Employees

  1. Jay McDowell says:

    Love this article … every Coaching Client I have is having issues finding qualified candidates at any price. I tell them they will need to “buy” their “A” employees. All the “A’s” are employed. The mention of the “no shows” to interviews is also a new phenomenon.

  2. Valerie Koenig says:

    great article, Posted it to LI.

  3. Doug Roof says:

    As always, John, you’ve avoided offering the simple or obvious answer and explained another complex issue that has a multitude of causes. Thanks for taking the time to put this together.

  4. Mark Komen says:

    My clients are also experiencing interview no-shows as well as people who sign up to work and then disappear after 2 or 3 days and are never heard from again!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Are Remote Employees Value Killers?

Remote employees can have a dramatic impact on the value of your business. If your exit strategy is to sell to a third party, take some time to think about the areas where offsite workers could have an impact.

Curb Appeal

One of the first things any good business broker will look at is your curb appeal. Your business needs to look good, just like a house that’s for sale. (OK, maybe right now a house doesn’t even need to look good, but you know what I mean.)

When I brokered Main Street businesses, I was always surprised at how much we had to tell owners. Clean up the piles of files in the office. Clean and sweep the parking area. Remove the pile of broken pallets next to the dumpster.

What message does your office space send?  Is it better to downsize, and just describe the employees who are no longer on the premises? Or would a buyer prefer to see a room full of empty desks, so that he knows he could bring them back if he so desired? (But he would also be calculating the wasted rent in his mental cash flow.)

Equating Dollar Value

What are your productivity measurements or KPIs for remote workers? Can you prove that they are worth what you are paying them? How? What level of confidence can a new owner have that he is acquiring a productive team? A recent survey in the U.K showed that almost 30% of remote employees were working a side gig on company time.

remote employeesHow is their remote presentation? Unless they are in a job that is strictly production-based, most will interact with customers, vendors or other employees. Do you have standards for their workspace and their appearance on video?

Can you give a buyer confidence in their compensation structure? New ownership can be a great time to ask for a raise. What assurances are there that it won’t happen? As I wrote a few weeks ago, how do you integrate them into your culture?

Confidentiality and Human Resources

Confidentiality about the transaction is more difficult. Does the buyer interview remote employees one by one? You can be sure they are talking to each other, whether on Teams or Slack or just texting each others’ cell phones.

On the other hand, a group video call raises new issues. A buyer could come out of it with a poor impression because one individual is obnoxious or inattentive. Someone might press for inappropriate information. (“Will all of us keep our jobs?”)

Remote Employees Increase  Risk

I am not campaigning against remote employees. They are a fact of life, now and likely for the foreseeable future. I’m just pointing out that handling their management, controlling the information flow to them, and anticipating their potential impact have all become part of exit planning.

The best surprise is no surprise. Part of your planning process when listing your company for sale should be how you will handle these questions.

Posted in Building Value, Entrepreneurship, Exit Strategies, Leadership, Management | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Downside of Remote Work

I came in this morning planning to write about the downside of remote work. It isn’t for everyone. In fact, it creates new long-term problems for businesses and will continue to do so. (For a related topic, see my previous column on returning to work.)

Coincidentally, this morning the Wall Street Journal posted an interview with Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JP Morgan. He said about remote work in part, “It doesn’t work for those who want to hustle. It doesn’t work for spontaneous idea generation. It doesn’t work for culture.

He is right, and remote work is a lot more threatening for Main Street businesses than it is for large corporations like the one he leads.

I have preached for decades that culture is the secret weapon of smaller companies. They can’t fight on the same financial terms as big corporations. There is a reason so many regulations regarding issues like family leave are limited to employers of a minimum size. Small businesses can’t afford to just “do without” an employee for weeks or months when that person is the only one who handles a particular area of responsibility.

The Main Street owner’s secret weapon

In a Main Street company talent is quickly identified and (usually) rewarded. Those who, in Dimon’s terms  “want to hustle” can move up more quickly. Real ability and ambition are too scarce a resource to ignore.

Smart business owners extend the culture of the business by their individual efforts. Knowing about their employees, their families, and their pastimes goes a long way to making them feel that they belong in the company. It’s hard to have those casual “discovery” conversations on Zoom, and almost impossible if there are multiple participants in a video call.

Our own business is built on collaboration. Almost everything gets passed around for comment, and we frequently meet via video to discuss things. It is often a difficult process, and clearly takes more time than if we could sit around a table.

We have employed remote workers for over a decade, but each one worked in our offices at some point. Our newest hire is in 2 days each week, and I am certain that she would not have melded so well with the rest of the team if she was entirely remote.

The biggest downside of remote work

When you erase the cultural advantage of a small business, what do you have left? In the harshest terms, money. That’s a battle we are guaranteed to lose. If the only differentiator to the remote employee is the amount on his or her automatic payroll deposit, we are well and truly screwed.

When we interview new clients, one of our questions is “Why do customers buy from you?” If the answer is “strictly on price,” it had better be a commercial bid contractor or an Internet-based retailer. In any other type of business, it indicates a problem.

Think of a remote workforce as an Internet-based human resource pool. If you can’t get noticed for your effort, if no one will know you as an individual, then the only differentiation between employers is price.

It is happening already. I have a client in Texas who is losing his tech remote workers to Silicon Valley. The employee of another client in the Midwest was recently poached by a New York firm. The pitch is simple. “You are already working from home. Why not do it for twice the money?” (That is not an exaggeration- both cases involved a doubling of salary.)

Employers as commodities

If someone approached your remote workers with a similar offer, how would you counter? I’m guessing that you can’t. I know that many of those who leave for a remote job with a giant employer won’t be happy in the long term. It’s the epitome of being a cog in the wheel. How many, however, will be willing to halve their income to feel more appreciated?

downside of remote workMy message is simple. The downside of remote work is that it turns employers into a commodity. A remote employee’s home office looks exactly the same today as it did yesterday. It will look the same tomorrow. If you want to maintain any hope of competing with the giants, the faster you restore in-person contact with your employees, the better chance you will have.

If you don’t take advantage of your cultural superiority, the ability to run your business may be decided by someone else’s department manager a thousand miles away.

Posted in Building Value, Entrepreneurship, Leadership, Management | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

5 Responses to The Downside of Remote Work

  1. Tracey Cheek says:

    I don’t completely disagree with you on this. Remote work is disconnected and collaboration and communication is hard. But we do it. I have been able to expand my reach for finding quality team members as well (I live in Oklahoma and talent can be limited here). But I do offer something that not many others can offer. I offer part-time flex work mainly for moms who are raising kids and want to work, but don’t want to go back to the workforce full time. There is a huge network of highly qualified women out there that fit this mold. As I’ve grown my team, I’ve learned there are more and more people out there piecing together remote part-time jobs so they can have flexible hours and flexibility of schedule. That’s the one thing the traditional companies cannot offer.

    • John F. Dini says:

      Your point is well taken, Tracey, but I can only partially agree. I recently read the new flex-work policy for one of the largest accounting firms in the country. They have options including part-time (scheduled by employee choice by days or hours), seasonal, surge, total-remote, partially remote, hot-desking as needed, sabbaticals, extended PTO, split-shift, and several others I never saw detailed before. The big-salary jobs I described are admittedly full-time, but that doesn’t mean large companies can’t match your flexibility.

  2. Christi Brendlinger says:

    I think that you missed a significant benefit for remote workers employed by Main Street companies… diversity, growth and burnout. The best thing about my job is that there are constant challenges and as a result, you get to wear a lot of hats. You get to try and solve wide-ranging problems outside of your expertise and that’s just plain fun (at least for weirdos like me). I know what it’s like to work for a large corporation. I have worked for several Fortune 500 companies and I shudder to think about going back to that world… even remotely. Don’t get me wrong, I LOVE coding but I also love all of the side projects, the unpredictability and opportunities to do something I’ve never done before. I get to move back and forth between projects at my pace so, I don’t burn out. Every day is a new adventure. Don’t forget about that when you are talking about the advantages of working for a Main Street company. For me, it’s a pretty big deal.

    • Beth Sorenson says:

      Though I kind of see your point about culture, John, I completely disagree with JP Morgan’s, “It doesn’t work for those who want to hustle. It doesn’t work for spontaneous idea generation. It doesn’t work for culture.”

      When employees show up to work after sitting in bumper-to-bumper traffic only to find another spewing off his/her own complaints upon arriving, how does that help with company culture or the bottom line? That spawns a full morning packed w/ negativity and unproductivity.

      I have worked remotely for almost 10 years. The flexibility allows individuals who are hustlers, get ‘r done-type workers, to decompress and come up w/ spontaneous, out-of-the-box ideas that they may not have in a cubicle. I have found that the largest obstacle to overcome working remotely is building trust, but that happens in-house as well..it takes time.

      Remote workers often don’t have the benefit of clocking out; the tasks and means to get it done are only a hand’s throw away. Us, not so hustlers, are typically the first to get the job done, regardless of personal schedule.

      I think JP Morgan needs to hire a new PR firm , possibly some new strategists.

  3. Doug Scheiding says:

    During and now post COVID I have started to remote work two days a week, usually Tuesdays and Thursdays. This is getting me an additional 4 hours of my weekly time back to make me more productive and a better quality of life. I do agree that remote work does degrade if not eliminate culture and spontaneity of idea/collaboration. It is also not for those that aren’t goal oriented or those that need others for motivation. Thus a part time model I think is best if it can be worked out.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Return to Work Owner’s Guide

Return to work policies are a new COVID-related minefield for business owners to negotiate. As more states make COVID control measures less restrictive or optional, the “requirements” of a safe workplace, and what we can demand of employees, are becoming even less clear than before.

The companies I work with range from essential industries, where full production has never paused, to tech companies where their office hasn’t seen a live human being in over a year. All are wrestling with return to work or relaxation of restrictions policies. After dozens of conversations, here are a few guidelines.

You Aren’t a Judge

return to workPerhaps the most important rule for staying out of trouble is to avoid making any decisions about what constitutes a “valid” employee issue or excuse. One employee’s child care challenges may seem more difficult than another’s. Some children have returned to school, others are being taught remotely. A number of daycare centers have reopened but many haven’t.

Some folks are still fearful of going out at all. Others have been socializing for months. You may have employees who fear mingling with those who haven’t been as diligent about protection. Nonetheless, returning to the workplace is a line in the sand. If you are going to demand the presence of some staff, the criteria have to be the same for everyone.

If you will permit remote working for some employees, it should be defined by specific job descriptions. For example, if customer service people have to be present, then all customer service people need to be present. Allowing telemarketers to work from home should mean that they all can. (We will deal with remote working requirements in a moment.)

Remember, if an employee was hired for a job requiring his or her presence in the workplace, it’s legitimate to say that the job still requires that presence in the absence of a pandemic.

Remote Working Policies

Remote working is a counterforce to company culture and employee retention. Severing the social fabric of the workplace is perhaps the most damaging effect of remote work.

That said, over 90% of employers say they don’t expect to return all employees to in-person physical presence, ever. Every survey of remote workers says that they would like to go to an office two days a week, but thirty percent of them say that having to return 100% of the time would be a reason to seek another job.

If you will permit some employees to work continue working remotely, it’s time to define the parameters.

  • Can the employee demonstrate an appropriate, dedicated remote workspace? When we went home with little warning or preparation, a lot of offices were on kitchen tables. That is probably not satisfactory for long-term professionalism.
  • Are there measurements of productivity? Some employees were more productive at home, but others were far less so. What metrics will determine whether or not an employee retains the flexibility of remote work?
  • Is there any required presence at your workplace? Some companies have specific days for everyone, or for sub-groups of employees. It should be plain that required days are just that. Attendance isn’t optional.

Infection Control Policies

Thankfully, it appears that the difficulty of proving a point of contagion has scared off most of the personal injury attorneys. You still need to demonstrate appropriate caution, both for liability protection as well as for the confidence of concerned employees.

  • If employees are utilizing the same space on different days, demonstrate a commitment to sanitizing in between users.
  • Have each employee sign an absence-of-symptoms form and check temperatures upon entry every day.
  • Allow space for social distancing in meetings. If sufficient space isn’t available, use a video conference application even for internal meetings.

Here are the CDC infection guidelines.

Return to Work

Even with clear policies and procedures, coming back will be disruptive, and not “just like before.” Here are a few unrelated tips some others have used.

  • If you are reconfiguring space, think carefully about the real need (besides prestige) for private offices. One employer has told executives “If you absolutely require full-time space dedicated for your sole use, we will require that you be here full time.”
  • Many days can be wasted as employees introduce or reintroduce themselves to one another and catch up on personal news. Consider having a restart event, where each employee answers 4 or 5 questions (either together or virtually) about their time away and changes in their lives.
  • Requiring vaccination is a tricky area, but one employer is making them a prerequisite for paid quarantine time after exposure. Those who been vaccinated will be paid until they receive negative results from an immediate test. If you haven’t, your 10 to 14 days quarantine is unpaid leave.

Return to work is a far more complex issue than just naming the date. Some preparation and advance communications will save a lot of time and headaches when the day arrives.

 

Posted in Building Value, Entrepreneurship, Leadership, Management | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Internal Leaders Affect the Value of Your Business

Internal leaders may not be obvious. They may not even have a “leadership” title. Make no mistake, however; internal leaders are critical to value and attractiveness when it comes to selling your business.

In Super Bowl 55 we saw the impact of an internal leader. Tom Brady has the highest winning percentage of any single athlete in major professional sports. The Tampa Bay Buccaneers have (or at least did up until this season,) the worst win/loss record over their entire existence of any major professional sports team. Yet one man changed the culture of the organization almost overnight.

Remember, for all the accolades being heaped on Brady, he is an employee. He doesn’t own the Buccaneer enterprise or negotiate any contracts other than his own. He didn’t choose the team’s logo, uniforms, location, or coaches.

Tom Brady is paid to fill only one of 53 player positions in the organization. There are also 31 coaches on the team, whose jobs are to teach and give direction to those 53 players. Although every player will acknowledge that winning is a team effort, none will argue the impact of one strong internal leader on his 83 coworkers.

Internal leaders can be good or bad

When I was a very young business owner, I hired an experienced salesman. He was an alcoholic, and began inviting other employees to his house for a cocktail after work. It took me some time (too long) to realize that he was plying his coworkers with free booze while he ranted daily about how poorly the company was being run.

I couldn’t understand why there was so much resentment among my team. They seemed to resist any direction I gave them. Finally, one person was kind enough to explain to me what was happening. Because this salesman was my top producer, I was afraid of the impact on revenues if I fired him.

He didn’t want my job. In fact, he didn’t want any of the responsibility that should go with leading. He had merely discovered one of the biggest truths about leadership. It’s easier to tear something down than build it up. People love to hear that things could be better. It’s making them better that is the tough part.

Tom Brady made the Tampa Bay Buccaneers better. Like any good internal leader, he didn’t limit his contribution to his job description as Quarterback. He helped recruit and train the people around him to build a better team.

Identify your internal leaders

An army dispatches its troops under the leadership of its lieutenants, but it succeeds on the ability of its sergeants. As a business owner, you can inspire with core values and set great goals. Whether you reach them, however, will be determined by your internal leaders.

When it comes time for your transition, they are more important than ever. If you are selling to family or employees, they may not expect to be included in equity, but they will determine the acceptance of those who are.

If you are selling to a third party, his or her achievements following the sale are conditional on the support of your internal leaders. They can prop up an inexperienced owner, or sink him without a trace.

If any part of your proceeds from exiting depend on the continued success of the business, you would be wise to identify your internal leaders, and make some provision for their continued loyalty after you are gone. If they don’t buy in, you could see the value of your enterprise (and your payout) decline substantially.

Posted in Building Value, Entrepreneurship, Exit Options, Exit Planning, Exit Strategies, Leadership, Life After, Management | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *