Service Needs to be a Defensible Territory

The UN air strikes against Gaddafi’s forces raise an obvious question. Why Libya? Although we believe Qaddafi is a really bad guy, there are plenty of other players in North Africa and the Middle East that have to rank somewhere near him on the Bad Guy Scale. Why could the United Nations get support (or at least abstentions from China, Russia and Brazil,) against Libya, when other despots are also killing their own protesters and defying international opinion?

I think the answer has a lot to do with defensible territory. Unlike Tunisia, Egypt, Syria, Yemen or Bahrain, the Libyan rebels took control of a distinct piece of geography around Benghazi. The big boys, America and European nations with modern weapons and air superiority, can’t bring them to bear in public squares filled with civilians and surrounded by homes. The Libyan desert offers an ideal tactical playground. Vast stretches of essentially unpopulated area where the bad guy’s forces are exposed, easily identified, and can be hammered without “unacceptable collateral damage.”

I know that I’m stretching an analogy here, but we use war metaphors in business all the time. From quoting Sun Tzu, to planning that involves strategy and tactics. We talk about gathering intelligence, employees being in the front lines, and more directly about trade wars and price wars. I’ll now add “Defensible Territory” to the list, although I’m probably not the first to use it.

As a small business, you compete on some level with much bigger foes. Whether it’s a big box retailer, a chain restaurant, or the Internet, someone is reaching out to your customers with more firepower (advertising, price advantages, technology) than you can muster. When you look at how you compete, do you have Defensible Territory?

The first answer of most small business owners is “We compete with better service.” Do you really, or are you just redefining your weakness as an advantage? Independent book stores looked at Amazon and said “Yes, but at Amazon you don’t have someone who knows your tastes, and can recommend what you like. That’s service.”

Amazon wiped them out with technology. Not only did Amazon learn to recommend related books, but their computers never forget a book you bought, or even one you looked at. It doesn’t matter how long it’s been since you walked in. They constantly refine their customer profiles. The employee who knows you the best never quits. If service is defined as knowing your customer, their computers far better at it than mere human beings.

So if you take away the definition of service as mere face to face contact, what do you have that is defensible? We use a company that delivers the filters for our home HVAC system every month. The price is several times what we would pay in Home Depot, but it is a low-cost item and the convenience far outstrips any concern over the cost. The actual day of delivery is unimportant. We don’t have to be home to receive it, and it doesn’t matter if we replace the filters a few days earlier or later.

That is a defensible position. Home Depot can’t offer that service. They are too big. The average sale is too small, regardless of how much margin it generates.

I have a friend who owns a mobile medical imaging service. They dominate the local nursing home market. Technicians are dispatched by text message and tracked by GPS. The nurses at the facilities are called when the technician is nearing them so they can prepare the patient. (An excellent example of cost-savings in technician time that is also perceived as added service by the recipients.) The digital X-Rays are transmitted via secure lines to a physician management group in another state, then distributed to MD’s for interpretation. Their verbal report is forwarded to the patient’s doctor almost immediately.

So the doctor gets a call from the nursing home on an elderly patient who fell, orders an X-Ray, and picks up the results on his cell phone a couple of hours later. He can then make a decision on whether it requires further intervention. This small business’ focus on building a system that makes things easy for their customers makes them dominant in their market.

I met an owner the other day with a fuel distribution business. He has selected a niche; small quantities of fuel delivered to commercial generator owners. Some need daily refilling of on-site equipment. Others have emergency generators that are tested and topped off monthly. Their needs are too small for the big distributors to service them. They are willing to pay a substantial service fee, because the effort and cost of sending employees to purchase fuel is astronomical compared to merely paying a premium price for the fuel itself.

In all three cases, the owners decided to define their service as something that added value, and needed to be paid for. They don’t compete on price. That would be the equivalent of the Libyan army offering to meet all of NATO in an open-field battle.

A warm greeting and a smile aren’t really service, they are the expected treatment for someone who is spending their money with you. One of my clients trains her employees to never answer “Thank you” with “No problem.” Service isn’t a problem, and we shouldn’t act as if it might have been under different circumstances. Courtesy and attention aren’t game changers, they are prerequisites.

Small business owners shouldn’t delude themselves that decent customer service is the same as Service. Customer service isn’t a differentiator. Service, if it is to make a difference to your customers, has to be a Defensible Territory.

Posted in Entrepreneurship, Leadership | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Peter Principle Goes All the Way Down

Every small business, if it is to be successful, needs a competent Second In Command (SIC). In many companies that position is held by dint of tenure or loyalty as opposed to pure ability. When we see a key employee who has responsibility beyond his or her capability, we frequently refer to “The Peter Principle.”

The Peter Principle is stated in chapter 1 of the book with the same title: “In a hierarchy every employee tends to rise to his level of incompetence“. For those who (like me), assumed the name sprang from some sort of slang, the original 1969 book describing the problem is coauthored by Dr. Laurence J. Peter.

But while the most obvious display of the Principle in a company (aside from an incompetent owner-which is much harder to deal with) is the SIC, the real problem is often that the same rule applies throughout the ranks.

This became painfully obvious when I was talking to two business owners last week. Both need a strong SIC. They acknowledge it, and want to fix it. However, neither has anyone at the third in command level who could step into the position. In fact, their main reason for seeking an SIC is because they can’t depend on the next level down to execute their jobs. So an SIC is intended to deal with the examples of the Peter Principle below him.

Of course, if the people at that level were competent at what they did, the owner wouldn’t be nearly as motivated to recruit a Second In Command. A conundrum? Yes, but one that is perfectly understandable.

The Peter Principle came from an analysis of hierarchies, or large corporations. Like many good ideas, it has been extended further than it’s original basis can support. A small business is a hierarchy, but one without redundancies or depth of resources. In a corporation you can work around someone, using others at the same level. You can terminate someone who doesn’t improve skill levels (the “up or out” approach), and choose someone from the next tier down for the subsequent try. You can, within budgetary constraints, hire additional staff to achieve the goal.

In a small business it is far more complicated. First, the person or persons involved are people. You know them. They are real, and you understand clearly what the loss of a position or compensation will mean to them and their families.

Second (and more important from the owner’s point of view), is the lack of redundancy. In fact, that’s what the British call a lay-off; a redundancy. It assumes that you can let those employees go because you have others who can do the job. In a small business, letting someone go usually means the business falls back on the owner as the repository of all corporate knowledge.

A company that has employees who are all ready to take on the next level above their job seems like a luxury to most owners. It requires your careful attention to development at every level. There is greater investment in training, even if the trainer is typically you. It calls for regular performance evaluations, that include concrete goals and objectives. It calls for rewards, both recognition and financial, for those who achieve those goals. It also requires clear career paths; advancement for those who prove their competence.

It isn’t easy, but the investment pays off every time.Your challenge is where to start. Use a pro-forma organizational chart to assess your human resources. Map every position as if it was filled by a competent player now. You should also map every position, along with the required skills, for your company in five years, or at twice it’s current size. At every level look at the players right below it. Do any show the potential to step up? If not, what actions are needed to make them ready?

For most owners, it is a sobering exercise. In order to get your whole company to the next level, however, you have to start somewhere.

Posted in Leadership, Management | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What are We Afraid Of?

Last weekend I took my sons to see “Battle for LA.” It’s a WWII infantry movie. All the great lines. “Go on without me.” “Mickey can hot wire that; he’s from Jersey.” “Your father was a very brave man.” Nowadays we are politically correct because instead of Gooks or Krauts or Slant Eyes or Commies we use aliens, who do not (yet) have civil rights representation.

Battle for LA is only the latest invasion movie. Besides the alien hordes, we are being overrun by flesh-eating zombies (including Walking Dead on cable TV). The movie industry has also rediscovered the western: True Grit, 3:10 to Yuma, Australia, Appaloosa and Comanche Moon– just to name the recent traditional ones.

When was the last time we flocked to the theatre to see cowboys, aliens and the undead? How about the 1950’s? Whether it was Shane or High Noon, Invasion of the Body Snatchers or The Mummy, Invaders from Mars or The War of the Worlds, we escaped to traditional square-jawed American Heroes overcoming impossible odds to prevail over evil.

We often laugh at the paranoia of the 50’s. It’s understandable, given the Cold War and the Atomic Bomb, but we are still amused by their naivete. So what’s our excuse in the 21st century?

We are scared again. Instead of waiting for the sirens that told us to go down into the basement (like that would have helped anyway,) we wait for the report that a terrorist has struck in another unexpected place. The news tells us daily that we are at risk from an earthquake or a tsunami, or perhaps our bank’s failure, or maybe just some local nut shooting up our kid’s school.

The fear that pervades the media wasn’t really a business issue until the recession. Now we aren’t sure that our traditional values of hard work and business ethics hold true any more. The best run company still fails if there are no customers. In the meantime, we watch Wall Street insiders make hundreds of millions of dollars selling fraudulent investments, and then walk away when they are caught. Pop Quiz: What is the current score card for indictments of those who sold sub-prime mortgages to employee pension funds as a “guaranteed investment?” 0. That’s Zero, Zilch, Nada,  Zip.

It’s no wonder we are afraid. Look for things to improve when they remake “The Sound of Music.”

Posted in Leadership, Thoughts and Opinions | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recessions, Recoveries Bring Out the Sharks

This article appeared in the San Antonio Business Journal on Friday, March 4th

A number of our business owner clients have been calling lately to ask about an offer that seems too good to be true.

The owner gets a call saying that a top business consultant will be in the area a few weeks from now. Although this consultant typically charges several thousand dollars a day, he has noticed an opening in his schedule. Rather than be idle, he is willing to take the time to do a complete assessment of your company at a greatly discounted price.

There are several national companies that use his approach, but the result is always the same.

The “consultant” is actually a salesman, and you’ve just purchased an eight-hour sales call.

The representative is trained to search your company data, and to conduct an interview that focuses on your weakest points. If you are cooperative, he will continue asking for information until he can identify your greatest pain in running your business.

The sales close can last for hours. He has specialists in your specific area of weakness, and they can transform your business in less than two weeks.

The cost is typically between $20,000 and $30,000. I know one owner who, desperate for help, used six different credit cards to pay the fee, which is always charged 100 percent up front.

Will you get help? That depends.

Most owners I know who have engaged one of these companies (and I know over a dozen) say that the suggestions were valid, but completely generic. They consist of “ideas” like: “The Company’s salespeople are underperforming in the owner’s opinion. We recommend that a sales compensation plan be introduced that relies more heavily on commission-based incentives.”

Is a three-ring binder or a CD filled with this kind of advice worth $30,000? I have yet to meet an owner who found real value from the advice, or who felt that the engagement rendered any lasting change in his or her business.

How do you spot a potential rip-off?

Legitimate professionals have only their time to sell. They don’t hire telemarketers to offer their skills at deep discount.

Every consultant I know will offer a no-cost initial meeting to determine the potential client’s needs, and to determine whether he or she is able to deliver the appropriate skills. While an initial retainer isn’t unusual for consultants, most proposals have a substantial portion of the payment due only after the consultant has completed the work to the client’s satisfaction.

Charging for an initial meeting, and charging all the fees before the project even begins are both red flags.

An effective advisor is willing to let the results of his or her work be the determining factor in payment.

Business owners in trouble are like blood in the water. Predators look for the weakest prey to attack first.

If you need help, ask around your business community for recommendations to a professional who has referrals from previous engagements, and who can use past clients as testimonials.

Buying a discounted “deal” from a telemarketer is never the magic bullet they claim it will be.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Does the Economy Affect Your Business?

I love this quote from Paul Krugman in a breakfast speech a few weeks ago.

“The Financial Industry rolled along extending credit to everyone, until they had their Wiley Coyote moment. You know how that works. Wiley Coyote runs off a cliff, but according to the cartoon laws of physics, he doesn’t fall until he looks down.”

That is a pretty good description of how the world financial system failed. In fact, the US economy was already in its third quarter of recession, and pundits, including the Long Johns of Britain, had brilliantly predicted the outcome for financial companies seven months before the collapse of Lehman Brothers.

If you read the contrarian economics websites, they are still looking for the next crash. Whether it is the surging foreclosure numbers, the resetting of Alt-A mortgages (which peaks in mid-2011), the withdrawal of Asia from the US bond markets, oil prices at $150 a barrel, collapse of an overheated real estate market in China, Quantitative Easing by the Federal Reserve (QE2) or the surge in commodity prices, there are plenty of potential scenarios to keep the doom and gloom crowd active.

In the meantime, my January prediction of recovery in South Texas seems to be coming true very quickly. Our February Board meetings were full of record sales, and the need to start hiring again. Should business owners jump on this as soon as there is evidence, or should they hold back in fear of another meltdown?

That depends on your business. If you are dependent on financing (as in commercial construction) or on capital expenditures (such as manufacturing) what happens on Wall Street can clearly affect what happens to you. If you are part of the local economy (retail, restaurant, services) then you may see an impact in your market, but you don’t have to see one in your business.

I know a restaurant whose pre-recession growth was between 8% and 10% annually. During the depths of the recession, it fell to 3-4% growth. No decline, just a minor slowing in the rate of increase. Other restaurants I know in the same area fell by almost 20%. Was it the recession, or were they just less able to compete in a tougher market?

A lawn service company I know grew 40% between 2008 and 2010. Scores of lawn maintenance companies in the area went out of business in the same time frame. A packaging distribution company grew over 20% during that time. An accounting firm by 18%. A construction company by 10%.

These businesses didn’t exist in a vacuum. Their customers didn’t have new sources of discretionary income. These owners were subject to the same challenges as the rest of us. They didn’t have massive cash reserves to market or advertise when everyone else pulled back. They did have excellent management, a focus on their customers, and systems to maintain profitability.

I typically meet (for the first time) between 20 and 30 business owners a month. Believe it or not, through the end of 2007 I still heard poor business performance attributed to “The effects of 9/11.” Now I’m sure those same owners are shaking their heads knowingly and saying “It’s the recession, you know.”

In the meanwhile, other small businesses continue to grow and thrive in the face of all indications to the contrary. Some 53% of our clients had record years in 2010. That isn’t nearly as good as in prior years, but it isn’t bad, either.

We might have another economic shock, or we might not. One thing is certain: our businesses have been tested, and we are supposed to have learned from the experience. If you are just now surfacing from survival mode, it is time to put the lessons to work. Make your business a ruthless and formidable competitor. Things will slow down again someday, and you want to be one of the success stories the next time.

Posted in Thoughts and Opinions | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *