All for One…

Most small business owners approach employee incentives with mixed emotions.They want to provide some system that creates a sense of urgency and responsibility in their employees, but they don’t want to give up too much of an already thin bottom line.

It isn’t greed as much as the constant awareness of the early days, when the entrepreneur worked endless hours for a pittance. Now that some of that is finally bearing fruit, she is being asked to share a chunk of it to get her workers to do what they should be doing anyway. The most common protest that I hear is “But I am paying them to do the job. Why should I have to pay them more if they actually do it right?”

Of course, if you could be sure that incentives were guaranteed to dramatically increase performance in a way that vastly grew your bottom line, you’d have no problem putting them in place for every person in the company. Why then is there such resistance to creating motivational rewards?

The answer is clear. Many, and perhaps most small business employee incentives fail to motivate enough of the desired behavior, and too frequently wind up becoming a permanent expense with a temporary impact.

There are methods of creating and maintaining incentives that avoid becoming an entitlement, and are dynamic enough to change and adapt with current conditions.We’ll talk about the approaches for the next several posts. Today we’ll start with an overview of types of incentives.

People are motivated by different things. As a behavioral analyst, I know that careful observation of the people I am dealing with will determine the types of incentive that will work best. For some, money is a motivator. For others, recognition or helping the rest of the team (which is a kind of recognition) is far more powerful.

In reality, all the forms of motivation work, but different types are more or less effective depending on the time and circumstances. Begin any discussion of incentives with a few preparatory steps.

Draw a two-by-two matrix. Label the left/right sides of the vertical divide “monetary” and “non-monetary.” Label the top/bottom halves above and below the horizontal line “individual” and “team.” Now you have a tool to track which incentives you’ve used, and which ones work in a given situation.

Next, make a list of all the employees whose performance can affect your bottom line. (Hint: that should be all of them.) Make two columns next to the names, one for individual/team and one for monetary, non-monetary. In the columns, write in the 2 factors for the type of incentive that you feel will work best with each type of employee. Don’t worry if you have people with the same job description or in the same department whom you think will respond to different types of incentives, we will get through all types before we are done.

In my next post, I’ll discuss how the types of incentives are used to drive different types of performance.

Posted in Entrepreneurship, Leadership, Management, Thoughts and Opinions | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

It’s Not Adoption

I spent some time this week with a client who was implementing his first-ever layoff. He has been in business for over 17 years, and has become very close with many of his employees. Some were friends before they were hired. Others have become friends over the years of working together.

When the term “layoff” is heard, 99% of the world thinks about the impact on the downsized employee. That’s understandable, but I think about the other 1%, the entrepreneurs who feel like their employees are family, and that they are failing in their obligation to them.

Small business owners are generally a self-abusive bunch. They frequently work longer hours than any of their employees (especially Tweeners- see 3/22.) They almost never compensate themselves sufficently for their investment or risk in the company, and usually take the first hit when cash flow is tight. Yet they frequently feel an obligation to sacrifice their own welfare in a futile attempt to save employees for whom they simply don’t have enough work.

As a business owner, you have an obligation to all of your employees. The long-term well being of your company, and their livelihood, depends on your commitment to keeping the business healthy and profitable. Like the captain of a ship, or a physician in a MASH unit, the burden of leadership sometimes entails making tough decisions.

Family members receive unconditional love. As responsible fathers and husbands, or mothers and wives, we are conditioned to stand beside out loved ones regardless of the cost. As business owners we make decisions, mete out discipline and rewards, and feel obligated to repay respect and loyalty. At times, it feels a lot like we’ve adopted an extended family.

Business is not family, however. Regardless of the “family atmosphere” in a company, employees still leave you when there is a conflict with their “real” family. Whether it is a transferred spouse, or just the opportunity to bring home a bigger paycheck, employees rightfully put their family’s interests ahead of their job.

If an employee suspects that you are sacrificing his future in an attempt to avoid the pain of a difficult decision, he has every right to find another employer who takes ownership responsibility more seriously. In the long run, that’s the more secure path for his family.

In the long run, you have to run a business in a way that is best for your real family. In your company you are the boss, not the parent.

Posted in Entrepreneurship, Leadership, Management | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

One Response to It’s Not Adoption

  1. Anonymous says:

    This article is very informative, many of the suggestions are often overlooked. Thanks for posting this one.

    Joel
    http://www.AmericasPrintCenter.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Who’s to Blame?

A story on the radio yesterday described the three families of 9/11 victims who continue to wage a legal battle with the airlines. Most of the bereaved accepted payment from the victims’ fund. Some 90 others settled out of court with the airlines. These three have dedicated themselves to the “truth,” subpoenaing hundreds of thousands of documents related to the incidents.

The documents include calibration and service of the x-rays and metal detectors, training schedules for the personnel, time records for those on duty at each step of the process, etc. According to one father of a woman who died, “We know someone is to blame for this, and the world has a right to know who it is.”

Why? I’m not denigrating their grief, but it seems to me that their quest, if it ever completed, won’t serve any purpose. Of course, in any system with thousands of moving parts, many of them human, there are going to be a few, perhaps dozens , of failure points. Somebody looked away at the wrong moment, scratched his nose, snuck off to the bathroom, forgot to log the calibration, or didn’t plug something in.

So if we find, say, that an X-Ray tech misread the unit when servicing it a week before, what then? Do you sue the service company? Do you sink some business under a sea of claims because some employee didn’t execute his routine job, error free, at 100% of his ability and training, eight years ago? That employee has likely moved on. Do you follow him, or does the liability rest with his employer? Do all the people who work there now deserve to lose their livelihood because of his mistake?

It struck me that many small business owners do the same thing. When they find an error, they spend too much time trying to fix the blame. They believe that, if they can identify the person responsible, he or she can be retrained, reminded or reprimanded into not making that mistake again.

It is impossible to train human beings to be error free. Detroit tried to fix that in the 60’s by putting inspectors at the end of the assembly line. They missed things too. So they added more inspectors, same problem. Lots more inspectors only provided very incremental improvement.

Eventually they learned that the system had to be constructed to avoid errors, and quality shot up dramatically. The process of doing things the same way, documenting them, and being accountable for the results, is what prevents us from the need to be blame hunters.

In some businesses it started as TQM. Now it is codified in systems like Six Sigma and ISO 9000. For a small business, it’s as simple as a checklist. (But it has to be a checklist that someone reviews, and audits from time to time.)

Start with a simple checklist for a step-by-step process in the area where you spend the most time fixing mistakes. You’ll be surprised at the impact.

Posted in Entrepreneurship, Leadership, Management | 1 Comment

One Response to Who’s to Blame?

  1. Anonymous says:

    Wow great article you wrote here.

    Joel ~ http://www.americasprintcenter.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tweens

A client asked me last week “Do you think that companies have a size at which they are particularly difficult to manage?”

Great question, and I think the answer is probably “yes.”

In the beginning, the solo entrepreneur (you) has a single employee… you. The good news is that solitary employee is one of the best that you will even encounter. Driven, willing to work endless hours without overtime, tenacious, problem-solving and totally dedicated to your company.

The bad news is that employee has a rotten and unappreciative Boss; but more on that another time.

Once the company grows large enough for across-the-board redundancy, it typically becomes much easier to operate. You have managers who supervise others in their daily tasks. You hire new employees, who are trained by others. Eventually, others do the hiring as well.

The problem is in between. There is a “no man’s land” that many, if not most, small businesses never cross. Each employee occupies a unique place in the organization, and is difficult to replace. We’ll call these companies Tweeners.

Tweens are girls between 9 and 12 (of 13, or 14 depending on who is defining) commonly said to be “too old for toys, too young for boys.” Tweeners in the NBA are those who are a bit too big to play a speed position, but a bit too small to play the power position. Tweens in Middle Earth were hobbits between 20 and 32 who had not reached full maturity. Tweening in animation is the insertion of frames between two figures to make them appear to morph seamlessly from one to another.

All these analogies can apply to the Tweener company. When you only have a few employees, you teach each one his or her job personally. They have regular contact with you on a daily or hourly basis, making their employment one long, continuous training session. Mistakes are quickly corrected, and new situations are addressed so that the employee can absorb the logic and approach of your problem-solving process.

In the Tweener company, you have too many employees for you to interact with each on an ongoing basis, but too few to duplicate all of your key skills in their multiple brains. There is no organizational memory, other than yours, to fill in the gaps created by natural turnover. Each termination, voluntary or otherwise, creates a vacuum. You have to neglect your daily responsibilities to fill the void, and personally train new person on at least the basics of the job.

Many small business owners attempt to control this by preventing turnover, considering it to be too painful to deal with unless absolutely necessary. That’s slow and certain death. Over time, it leads to a company where key employees are overpaid (because they get regular increases to keep them ‘happy’) and under qualified. Getting a high-performing manager becomes merely a matter of luck.

The owner is shocked every time an important employee leaves, although statistically it is going to happen at least every few years or so. People move, fall in love, get married, have kids, get divorced. Hoping that every hire is “for life” is foolish and unproductive.

Other owners respond to the Tweener dilemma by under training. You may look at a new employee and say “I’m not sure this one is a keeper. I’ll minimize my time with him until I’m sure.” or perhaps you spent a great deal of time teaching the last person all the details of the job, only to lose him anyway. So this time you decide to just teach what’s needed to make him productive, and get back to your daily duties.

Or maybe you are just too busy to do it right.

Regardless of your logic process, either approach leads you onto a slippery slope. Under-trained or under-qualified employees gradually increase the burden of decision making on you. They are the chief reason so many small business owners become permanent fire fighters.

How to you prevent becoming a Tweener organization, or fix it if you are one already?

The most common (and correct) answer is to document your knowledge in a way that others can access quickly and easily. Policies and procedures, job descriptions, checklists, forms, tutorials and FAQ’s are all excellent methodologies, and are usually all too neglected in small companies.

Documentation, however, is a daunting task. How can you do a brain dump of your entire business, and still attend to your other duties?

The answer is like the one to the question “How do you eat an elephant?” (One bite at a time.) You don’t have to do the documentation personally, but you’ll need a logical and organized approach to getting it done.

Start with your best, most competent employee. This will fly in the face of your first instinct, which will be to start with your least trained, most mistake-prone employee. Don’t bother. The effort will be much greater, and the results far less impactful.

Put appointments on your calendar for the documentation process. At first, you will need two a week. The first is to explain what you expect, and perhaps to discuss your view of the employee’s job (or what you think it should be.) The second appointment will be to review what the employee has written. After a while you will need only the review meeting, as the employee begins to comprehend your expectations.

You’ve tried documentation before, without success? The problem usually (you knew this was coming) lies with you. You have to show self-discipline and commitment to the process.

The first and most important contribution to success: Don’t cancel the documentation appointments. They are your expression of the importance of the task. Understand that the employee won’t get it right the first few times, and resist the temptation to take over the process. Let them work through the process of understanding what you expect. Don’t settle. It is far better to get the job done right than to spend time and money on lousy documentation. Remember, this is employee training time, but training time with long-lasting benefits.

Start with the job description, including hiring qualifications, then move on to duties. Avoid the temptation to dive into step-by-step procedures (although the employee may be inclined to start there.) Such documentation is difficult to maintain. Work from the higher level viewpoint to the lower.

So your bookkeeper’s job description includes “oversee accounts payable.” His duties include “log vendor invoices in QuickBooks” and “run A/P ageing report every Monday.” Eventually you may get to “Open QuickBooks, click on reports,” etc. but that is far down the road. Don’t bother with “Stamp each invoice with the APPROVED stamp” unless you are sure that it’s a procedure that is written in stone. Those simple step-by-step tasks are the most easily taught.

When you have one position documented fully, start with another. The first one will take at least a few months. The rest will go more quickly. As each is completed, you will spend less time answering questions and making decisions, and have more time to work on the next one.

And if you have an employee who just isn’t capable of doing it, you already have one answer to what you can do to move beyond being a Tweener.

Posted in Entrepreneurship, Thoughts and Opinions | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

One Response to Tweens

  1. Anonymous says:

    Wow, this article is great too. Never looked at it from your perspective before. Thanks for this!

    Joel
    http://www.AmericasPrintCenter.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your Official Inflation Notice

A number of my clients have not yet reacted to the crashing of the financial world around them. They are not idiots, but San Antonio remains relatively healthy, and almost 2/3 of the companies we currently work with (about 104 at present) saw record years in 2008.

When I talk about inflation, most of them understand it as a broad economic problem. Treasury is printing vast amounts of paper to stimulate the economy. Eventually the currency will devalue to adjust for oversupply, and commodity prices will rise.

But the first inflation to hit your business will result from the financial market meltdown. Financial companies (banks, other lenders, REITs, insurance companies, investment firms) grew over the last 15 years from 6% to 25% of the total market capitalization on the NYSE. Now they are shrinking rapidly, and the impact to your pocket will be swift.

There is a more focused inflation, a cost shifting that applies to small business owners, and it has started already. Your operating expenses are about to rise dramatically, and you should be taking steps to preserve your margins today.

The first hits will come at insurance renewal time. Assuming you are still among the ever-shrinking group of small employers who provide health insurance, that inflationary spiral isn’t about to slow. The medical community has no ability to conserve costs. Providers proudly stick with a philosophy of “whatever it takes,” even though the “whatever” just happens to be the most lucrative choice for them.

With reductions in government payment programs, fewer insured employees and a higher demand for emergency and uncompensated care, do you really expect doctors and hospitals to respond by developing Lean production methods? No, their instinct will be to do as they always have before, to shift the burden to those who still have the money to pay.

In 2000 I predicted that we would see some form of national health insurance by 2011, and that small business owners would lead the campaign to get it passed. I still hold by that prediction.

Property and Casualty premiums have always risen in an inverse relationship with the stock markets. They have been falling for a number of years, as insurers competing for business, and supplemented their earnings with fat portfolio returns. The collapse of their investment income will quickly show up in substantial premium hikes.

Expect the same before the end of this year in Unemployment and Workers’ Compensation insurance. Despite Federal supplements, the insurance funds in each state are depleting fast, and premiums will rise suddenly and dramatically.

All forms of credit are becoming more expensive. Limits on company credit cards are falling, while the interest rates are rising. Spreads are increasing on lines of credit and equipment loans. Higher loan default rates and exploding FDIC insurance premiums are another way that the costs of bad operators are being foisted onto those who were more careful in their decision making.

As a small business owner, you have little choice in paying up for these increases. The interlocking interests of the banks, insurers and government have created a playing field where one requires that you do business with the other. Banks want you to have insurance as a condition of lending. Insurance companies have their profits guaranteed by government regulators, regardless of their investment ability. Other regulators control how the banks lend, and what they should require from you.

So, if you haven’t begun looking through your expenses to figure out where the money for increased insurance and financing costs is to be found, it’s time to start.

Posted in Thoughts and Opinions | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

3 Responses to Your Official Inflation Notice

  1. rob@flextx.com says:

    John:

    I would agree to a point – but I think business insurance is an area that will remain open to negotiation – we saw our business property premiums increase only slightly at our recent renewal. Perhaps they are not fully feeling the pressure, yet.

    Since insurers will be hurting just as badly, they want to convert coverage from their competitors, which means more aggressive pricing models – more coverage for the same amount or the same coverage for less money.

    Analogy – how do you know a bank is in trouble right now? It offers the best rates on CDs, to suck in capital now to shore up its balance sheet while pushing higher expenses down the road.

    Since any cash from a new account is better than no cash, insurers will compete on price to put money in the bank. And, of the three entities you discussed, insurers are the easiest to change, at least for property and casualty insurance.

    Health insurance is more difficult to change, and in fact, you could argue it is more of a hassle to change it instead of your bank. But, for every business there is a point where no matter how badly you want it, the health insurance premium becomes unsustainable. Looking at the trend, a lot of businesses have already reached that point.

    Unfortunately for insurers, they don’t have the direct power of the state to force you to buy.

    Thoughts?

  2. kiramatali shah says:

    . The Center for Media Research has released a study by Vertical Response that shows just where many of these ‘Main Street’ players are going with their online dollars. The big winners: e-mail and social media. With only 3.8% of small business folks NOT planning on using e-mail marketing and with social media carrying the perception of being free (which they so rudely discover it is far from free) this should make some in the banner and search crowd a little wary.
    http://www.onlineuniversalwork.com

  3. kiramatali shah says:

    very niec……………..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *