Can You Outgrow Customers?

When you start a company, it’s like shopping at the supermarket when you are very hungry. Everything looks good. Any suspect might be a prospect. Any prospect is worth pursuing, and your ideal customer is anyone who is willing to pay you for your product or service.

As your business grows, you begin to differentiate between good customers and bad customers. Those who don’t deal with you fairly, pay late, are always denigrating your product in hope of extra discounts, or demand extra services above what they pay for are allowed to fall by the wayside. Their departure is noted with a “good riddance,” if it is noted at all.

If you are fortunate, and keep your promises, a few of your first customers become your best customers. You develop relationships. They depend on you as a trusted vendor, and you show appreciation for their loyalty by serving them as well as you can. Your company grows, based in no small part on these steady accounts.

outgrowingCan you outgrow these loyal customers? Is there a point where their business is no longer worthwhile to you? For most of us, the instinctive answer is “no.” Someone who has supported us on those first crucial steps up the ladder deserves our gratitude. But gratitude doesn’t address the other issues that come with a customer/vendor mismatch.

One of my clients owned a commercial general contracting company. When he started, they took in a few million dollars a year doing tenant improvements for strip centers and restaurant remodels. The company developed a reputation for bringing in jobs on-time and under budget, and after a few years he had built up a steady clientele of property owners.

His skill in project management landed him progressively larger jobs. He became a specialist in building bank branches, private schools and churches. Each of those jobs was about the same size as his entire revenue in the first few years, and eventually he was contracting for a dozen such buildings a year.

He remained loyal to his first customers, but fitting in a hundred thousand dollar remodel between multi-million dollar commitments grew more challenging. Each job now involved an estimator, a project manager and a supervisor, where he had once filled all those roles personally. The smaller jobs couldn’t carry the overhead. Where he once gave the restaurant owners a daily progress report by telephone, now they were scheduled between his meetings with CEOs and Boards of Directors.

Not surprisingly, his long-time customers began to complain. They didn’t have the access to or the attention from the owner that they once enjoyed. His pricing was getting more expensive. They sometimes had to wait weeks or months for a spot on the schedule.

He tried his best to address the issues. He dedicated special staff to smaller projects, and put his most senior project manager in charge of them. He couldn’t change his overhead costs, however, and that division relied on the support of the bigger jobs to cover expenses.

After years of trying to address the problem, he finally notified his small customers that he was no longer able to quote projects of less than $1,000,000. Many reacted as you might expect, perceiving his decision to be based on self-importance and greed, without any regard for their needs.

In reality, he had to let them go. He was no longer able to give them the type of service that he was known for, and that they had a right to expect. He had tried to roll back his company to a version of its earlier model, but in fact he was just subsidizing their work for old times’ sake, and still delivering at less than the expected level of service.

You’ve outgrown your customers when you can no longer serve them profitably or well. You can show your gratitude by helping them find a vendor who better serves their needs.

Picture Credit

My new book, Hunting in a Farmer’s World: Celebrating the Mind of an  Entrepreneur, is now available on Amazon in paperback, hardcover and Kindle. It is an ownership book, not a management book, and is illustrated with the stories of real entrepreneurs who faced challenges that apply to us all.

Posted in Marketing and Sales | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

One Response to Can You Outgrow Customers?

  1. Steve Wells says:

    Great article on growth and customer “FIT”. Your reference to going to the supermarket when you are hungry is dead on when starting a business from scratch. Anything and everything is a good opportunity and job. As we have grown, we have been fortunate enough to improve the quality of our customers, replacing some of our original customers for many for the reasons you mentioned. As we have grown, we have also made changes for one other important reason.

    As our business has matured, we have a much clearer Vision, Mission and Strategic Plan and unfortunately, some of the customers that helped us start our business no longer align with our current and future plans. While many of us strive to support them for too long, when a customer no longer fits, it’s typically not a fit from either side and prolonging the inevitable isn’t in anyone’s best interest. It’s just a tough decision to let go of good customers that no longer fit your business!

    I totally agree with trying to match the good customers with another provider, one that better fits their needs and whom they better align with.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What is Your Company Worth? II

Last week we discussed how business owners frequently use hearsay or incomplete information to estimate the value of their companies. They give the number to their financial planner, or include it on a personal financial statement for their banker, neither of whom bat an eyelash at the estimate. Having the amount “accepted” by financial experts, the owner starts to treat it as fact. How do you know whether it is realistic or achievable?

alchemistValuation of a small business is a combination of art and science. No two small companies are alike. A multiple of profits or cash flow is only the starting point. Take two small companies, each with $4,000,000 in revenues and $500,000 in profits. Each pays the same salary and benefits to the owner. One does it by having systems that control most day to day activities, recurring revenue from contracts, and long-term employees who are incented by profit sharing. The other does it with an owner who works 70 hours a week, hasn’t had a two week vacation in ten years, and makes every new sale personally. Which business would you pay more to own?

Beauty lies in the eye of the beholder. The multiples paid for businesses depend on the type of buyers they attract. Commonly, those that sell for less than $2,000,000 are considered “Main Street.” Their target buyers are individuals who are purchasing an income. They intend to work in the business, and to earn a regular paycheck by running it.

Main Street businesses are valued by a multiple of Seller’s Discretionary Earnings (SDE). The value of the business is based on the sum of the financial benefits resulting from ownership. That includes profits, salary, benefits and any of a long list of possible perquisites like a company car, travel, or insurance. (For more on calculating your SDE and selling a business in general, you can read my book, 11 Things You Absolutely Need to Know about Selling Your Business.)

Main Street pricing is typically between 2.1 and 2.8 times SDE. It is based on simple arithmetic. The closer you come to 3 times SDE, the less able a buyer is to pay both the bank and himself. You can run your own numbers here, to see how it works (registration required).

For larger companies, those that attract financial and industry acquirers, the multiples are higher, but the multiplier is lower. Those buyers anticipate paying for professional management, so the owner’s compensation is less of a consideration. They look at EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) to calculate available cash after all the expenses of running the business (including executive talent) are paid.

Competitors will calculate the savings they might realize from consolidation, but are usually reluctant to multiply those savings in a purchase price. Private Equity Groups (there are 7,000 in the US) and the acquisition arms of large companies seldom look at businesses with earnings of less than $1,000,000. As amazing as it seems to a small business owner, their due diligence and legal processes are too expensive to make smaller acquisitions worthwhile.

Private Equity Groups pay an average between 4.7 and 5.2 times EBITDA, year in and year out. That makes sense, because they are financial buyers with a targeted Return On Investment (ROI). Large company acquisitions of smaller businesses can range from 4 times EBITA up to around 7 or 8, although in a few cases strategic considerations (competition, exclusive contracts, proprietary methods) can drive that up substantially .

All of these are real numbers, based on actual sales data and industry surveys. Sellers often confuse the terms revenue and income, or apply EBITDA multiples to SDE. They are greatly disappointed and angry when legitimate offers fall far below their expectations. Just because your planner or your banker didn’t challenge your valuation estimate doesn’t make it fact.

My new book, Hunting in a Farmer’s World: Celebrating the Mind of an Entrepreneur, is now available on Amazon in paperback, hardcover and Kindle. It is an ownership book, not a management book, and is illustrated with the stories of real entrepreneurs who faced challenges that apply to us all.

Posted in Building Value, Entrepreneurship, Exit Options, Exit Planning, Exit Strategies, Top Blog Posts | 1 Comment

One Response to What is Your Company Worth? II

  1. John Smith says:

    I work for a small/medium sized family owned business as their CFO. When the owner went out and received his eye-widening “professionally prepared” valuation of his business I asked him the simple question; “would YOU pay that much for the right to run this place?” The follow on question is “you can pay x amount because you already know the players, products and producers. Would a buyer who does NOT have that information at hand need to discount that number to generate similar earnings ?”

    Every valuation is prepared with an end use in mind: Seller’s POV, Buyer’s POV, Tax prep POV. Each end use will result in a different number. From an owner’s perspective, look at all of them and ask yourself “would I pay that?”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

What is Your Company Worth?

A business owner hires a financial planner to help him with his retirement options. They review the owner’s current assets, his house, stock portfolio and other investments. They go over his insurance coverage. Then the planner asks, “What about your company? How much is that worth?”

The owner replies with confidence, “Oh about five million dollars. Maybe a little bit more.” The planner dutifully adds it to the asset list, and includes it in his calculations. In years of questioning financial planners about this, I’ve found that about 80% accept the owner’s estimate of the value as fact. They assume that the owner must have a pretty good idea of what his largest asset is worth. It is his business, after all.

But what if the owner is wrong? Not only wrong, but completely deluded about the value of his company? Then the planner is basing all his assumptions about retirement, family security, and future income based on assumptions that may be 50% or more off from reality. It happens far more often than you may think.

bragAn owner runs into a long-time colleague at a trade show. In reply to the “What’s new?” question his friend says “Well, I just sold my company. I got $4,000,000.” The owner knows that his company is about 25% larger than his friend’s, so $5,000,000 must clearly be his market value.

Any seller will always claim the highest number he can justify. After a lifetime of building a business, our egos are heavily invested in the bragging rights. The pleasure lies in telling the number, not presenting the details. So that $4,000,000 includes assumption of the company’s $700,000 working capital line, purchase of $1,000,000 in accounts receivable (which were collectable by the seller anyway), and payout of $500,000 in loans that the owner made to his company with post-tax dollars. Of the remaining $1,800,000, some may be conditional on future company performance, tied to continuing employment, in the form of an installment note, or in restricted stock.

Yet our business owner confidently walks away knowing that his company is worth $5,000,000. It must be accurate, since his friend wouldn’t lie and that selling price was determined in an arms-length transaction. Our owner begins planning his future around the day he receives a check for $5,000,000.

In my work with hundreds of business owners, this is a more frequent scenario than not. We have a deep-seated need to believe that our years of sacrifice and hard work are going to pay off handsomely.

Valuation, like most financial benchmarking, is an uncertain art. The professional small business appraisers whom I work with consider assets and cash flow, but also use future industry prospects, local or regional economic trends, the company’s historical revenue and profit variability in developing their opinions.

They usually don’t factor in the financial markets, but those are the most critical influencers of all. Whether lenders are seeking to finance business acquisitions (2006-2007) or avoiding them as if they were the Black Plague (2009-2011) can dramatically affect selling prices.

The buyer is also a determining factor, and not just for credit-worthiness or price negotiation. Individual buyers, competitors, private equity groups and publicly traded companies all have differing ideas of where the value is in an acquisition. They pay a wide range of  multiples, and even calculate those multiples on different financial benchmarks.

How much is your company really worth? We’ll go deeper into that next week.

My new book, Hunting in a Farmer’s World, Celebrating the Mind of an Entrepreneur, is now available in paperback and hardcover on Amazon. (Kindle next week.) It is an ownership book, not a management book, and is illustrated with the stories of real entrepreneurs who faced challenges that apply to us all.

Posted in Exit Planning, Thoughts and Opinions, Top Blog Posts | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Who Owns the Portal?

We are 30 years into the computer revolution, which I am arbitrarily marking as beginning in the mid-1980’s, when Apple II and IBM compatible (286) computers began to show up on the desks of people who weren’t in the “computer room.” We are 20 years from the mid-1990’s, when the Internet became easily available to anyone with a modem and AOL CD’s began filling our mailboxes.

I remember chastising an employee for unnecessarily adding a 30 megabyte hard drive to a PC that already had 20 megabytes of storage. That seemed like such ridiculous overcapacity for our sole computer. It handled our manufacturing production, inventories, customer records and accounting. Now my IPod shuffle puts 50 times that computer’s capacity into the little change pocket of my jeans.

As technology has become ubiquitous, it’s created another issue. Anyone with money, processing power and software can duplicate the technological prowess of anyone else with money, processing power and software. Proprietary advantages have narrowed, and the time cushion of being “first to market” has almost disappeared.

vaultMost businesses can’t function without their computer capabilities. When a major outage brings the whole company to a dead stop, redundancy becomes a critical part of survival. That is driving more technology services into the cloud. Our lifeblood information is increasing kept where we can’t see it. In fact, we probably don’t know where it is. A small business in Dallas may be taken out of commission by floods in Iowa or a power outage in Pennsylvania. We don’t know where the threat is until something happens.

Everyone wants a customer relationship that is “sticky”, where the barriers to exit are so challenging that the buyer becomes dependent on the vendor to run his business. In technology, that means owning the portal — a single point through which the data flows.

The fight for the portal has become the battlefield of giants from many industries. The telephone companies, cable television operators and (soon) the power utilities all want to own the pipeline. How many of us buy our telecommunications from a cable TV provider, or our television from a phone company?

Content is another portal. The Apple and Android apps markets offer simple, low cost programs to help run a business. Google, Amazon and Apple are pushing into television content portals. That is a search engine, a retailer and a device manufacturer fighting over the exact same space.

The portal to your business is the biggest prize of all. Keeping your financial records, your customer information and your operating capabilities in one place is the holy grail of those who serve small business. That relationship is being chased by software makers (Intuit), credit card companies (Amex and Visa), stock brokers (Schwab and E-Trade), insurance companies, and every bank in the country.

What is your portal strategy for customers? How are you using technology to build their dependence on you? Do you keep their information in a way that is helpful to them? Can you tell them when to stock up based on prior business patterns? Are you the trusted source for product or industry information? Do you make your connections available to them for new business opportunities?

If you engage in consultative sales, do you provide information beyond just the features and benefits of your product? Can you become the go-to source for best practices or learning new methodologies? Can you build a relationship that provides so much value that price ceases to be a purchasing consideration?

It sounds like a tall order for a small business, but the tools are readily available and relatively inexpensive. Your differentiation lies not in having the technology, but in how you use it.

Picture Credit

Posted in Entrepreneurship, Thoughts and Opinions | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

A Tiered Minimum Wage for Small Business

Recent strikes by employees of McDonalds and Wal-Mart demanding a higher minimum wage have gained headlines on all the news feeds. The strikers claim that they can’t live on the Federally mandated $7.25 an hour. The California legislature recently voted to raise that state’s minimum wage from $8.00 to $10.00 hourly.

Certainly for a full time worker (40 hours for 50 weeks a year) making $14,500 a year isn’t a viable living wage. Add in approximately $1,800 Earned Income Tax Credit, and assume only 8% in payroll taxes (SSI and SUI) and we are still only at $1,260 a month. Take out $500 for shared rent and utilities on a small apartment, $50 a week for gas, and a $250 payment on a used car, and a single person is left with about $75 weekly for food, clothing, cell phone and entertainment. Not an impressive lifestyle.

Under the new California minimum, you’d have $136 a week, assuming you could find a $500 apartment in, say, San Francisco. In either scenario, there isn’t much left for a doctor’s visit or an oil change.

Unfortunately, raising wages doesn’t always help. According to The Economist, the effective marginal tax rate (combined loss of credits/benefits and income tax) by increasing annual income from $18,000 to $20,000 a year is 95%! That’s right; making $2,000 more would earn $100 for the worker, and net the government an additional $1,900.

mcdonalds-workersNow, let’s look at the employer side. Using rough published numbers,  Wal-Mart earned about $4.50 for every employee hour worked last year. McDonalds’ earned about $1.60. Part time workers might make those numbers substantially higher, but it’s in the range. So a $2.00 increase in hourly wages would theoretically reduce Wal-Mart’s profit by 40%, and force McDonalds’ to rethink their entire labor model. (Self-serve kiosks, anyone?)

The minimum wage is not a living wage, and increasing it by a few bucks doesn’t make it so. Politicians are candid about their objectives with minimum wage levels. They believe raising them raises all wages. If entry level folks make $10.00 an hour, then the workers who were being paid $10.00 will have to be paid $13.00. They are swinging at a skin rash with a meat axe.

There are many reasons why trying to make the minimum wage into a living wage is problematic. Small business is often the first training ground for young people. Fast food restaurants are where millions of kids learned to show up on time, do things a particular way, and simply pay attention to what they are doing. That costs the employer money in addition to the wages.

Students, retirees and spouses may seek part-time “play money” work for supplementary income. They aren’t dependent on a living wage from the job.

Some employers really can’t afford it. Minimum wages aren’t means-tested for small business. What if an owner is bootstrapping a start-up? He or she might not even be earning minimum wage personally.

Placing a 15 year old high school kid, living at home and eating free food, into the same classification as a 30 year old single mother of two is dumb. Just as nonsensical is joining a small employer struggling for break-even in the same bucket as Wal-Mart. We need a system that recognizes the realities of the marketplace. Here are a few ideas:

  • A lower “Training wage” for the first year of employment. Everyone pays social security , so the employment records already exist. For someone who can’t keep a job, or works only a few hours a week, that might be tracked as the first 2,000 hours of employment.
  • A discounted minimum wage for those who are claimed as dependents by others.
  • A tiered minimum wage for smaller employers, with tranches by number of employees. Existing ERISA regulations would apply to prevent chain operators from segmenting their business into many “small” employers.
  • A stepped minimum based on continuous service. If an employer keeps a worker full time for a year, he/she is either deserving of a raise, or the employer has a problem with developing people.
  • A special work/study minimum wage for workers who are interning in a field that matches their current enrollment in a job training program.

In a recent conversation with an official at the Federal Reserve, he expressed the Fed’s concern with the relationship between two statistics. The USA has the highest sustained unemployment in 70 years, while simultaneously recording all time highs in the number of help wanted ads. We are not training folks in how to qualify for, obtain and hold decent jobs. The meat axe of raising minimum wage levels across the board isn’t going to fix that.

Picture Credit

Posted in Management, Thoughts and Opinions | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

2 Responses to A Tiered Minimum Wage for Small Business

  1. craig says:

    Thoughtful. Need more of that!
    cj

  2. Larry says:

    I vote “yes” on this plan!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *