Monthly Archives: October 2012

Employee Confidentiality: Circles Within Circles

The father of a friend, a rancher in South Texas, conveys confidential information by preceding it with the following caution. “Now I’m going to tell you a secret, and you have to swear not to tell another soul. And when … Continue reading →

Posted in Leadership, Management | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business Value: Do Your Numbers Add Up?

Most small business owners don’t understand how to value their companies. For some, misunderstanding the way that buyers look at the value of your business can be very costly in the long run. The fourth of our Rights and Obligations … Continue reading →

Posted in Entrepreneurship, Exit Planning | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

3 Responses to Business Value: Do Your Numbers Add Up?

  1. Jeff Thomas says:

    Jon,
    Where can i find more on SDE evaluation?

    Jeff

    • John F. Dini says:

      Jeff,
      Pratt’s Stats, among others, will show historical and conparative valuations using SDE measures. To calculate your own SDE, I am sending a worksheet I created directly to you.

  2. Larry Amon says:

    John,
    I agree that most business owners take advantage of personal perks while running the business and I think most buyers realize that. When it comes to selling the business I have business owners recast their financials to deduct their perks and add back in a salary for the new owner. It reflects the true value of the company and the buyer can make their decision based on the recast numbers without the tax burden for the owner for the previous three years.
    Larry Amon

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Atlas Shrugged and the Imperial Presidency

“Atlas Shrugged – Part II” was released on Friday. Those of you who read this column regularly know that I’m a fan of Ayn Rand, although I place myself far short of devout Objectivism. I’ve sported “Who is John Galt?” license plate … Continue reading →

Posted in Thoughts and Opinions, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

One Response to Atlas Shrugged and the Imperial Presidency

  1. Government is a business, albeit a monopoly on certain items like defense but it too has all the charateristics of an operating business. No surprise if it should also devour competition to be the sole provider.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Health Care Costs: Is Medicine a Market?

There is an excellent article in The New Yorker comparing the production and quality control methods of the Cheesecake Factory to certain advances in “Big Medicine.”  It focuses on the savings available from large health systems through standardization and quantity purchasing. In reality, … Continue reading →

Posted in Thoughts and Opinions | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

One Response to Health Care Costs: Is Medicine a Market?

  1. Mimi Grant says:

    John, loved your post. Here are a few more issues to factor in: most “customers” (folks who actually pay the bill) don’t see the doctor. Why? Because these customers are typically the employers and governments that are paying the insurance premiums. Only those few truly paying “cash” for services, or those in the “individual market,” where they’re paying their own premiums, are the true customers who have a better idea of the actual cost of healthcare.

    Of course, the government, through the Affordable Care Act, is trying to give more individuals “greater access” to care. This in turn has accelerated another phenomenom: consolidation. As hospitals hire physicians directly, where they can, or indirectly through Foundations, in the states where they can’t, prices are going up – simply because hospital-based services receive a higher reimbursement.

    The other trend we’re seeing is the increase in “direct pay/concierge” physicians. With rates typically starting at $2000/year and going up from there, these doctors “limit their panel” of patients they see, a win-win for the doctor (smaller patient panel for the same or more money) and the patients who can afford this perk (easier access). The only problem is – now that the doctor’s panel has decreased, let’s say, from 3000 to 600 patients – the 2400 Former Patients need to find a new doctor. Play this out, as we hear is happening in Massachusetts, and the unattended consequence of providing for greater access, is greater expense and/or longer waits to see your same (or a new) doctor.

    Clearly we need to “bend the cost trend” to bring down the unsustainably growing high cost of healthcare. But who among the 18% making their living from this 18% of the GDP spent in healthcare (the ultimate “service” business), is going to “volunteer” to cut their compensation? After all, when you have burgeoning demand from the Medicare population (and the 10,000 Boomers a day joining it), and a society – starting with our children – increasingly prone to obesity and all its attendant ills, due to their eating/lack of exercise choices, what “magic bullet” is going to bend this trend?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *